简介：影片根据英国童书作家Georgia Byng的作品改编，主人公莫莉梦妮是一个孤儿小女孩，偶然发现了一本催眠书，她学会了催眠他人，在后来的一系列书籍中，莫莉还掌握了其他能力，包括停止时间、时间旅行、阅读他人思想和变形。利用催眠术莫莉在一场纽约比赛中名声大噪，变成出名和富有。然而，另一伙人也盯上了那本催眠书，他们找我莫莉，胁迫她参与一起抢劫纽约最著名珠宝店的计划。

简介：

一名松露猎手(凯奇饰)独自居住在俄勒冈州的野外，当他心爱的觅食猪被绑架后，他必须前往波特兰，带着自己被抛弃的过往，去拯救那只猪。

简介：托尼亚（玛歌特·罗比 Margot Robbie 饰）成长在一个破碎的家庭之中，和母亲（阿丽森·詹尼 Allison Janney 饰）过着相依为命的日子。托尼亚的母亲是一个冷若冰霜而又独断专行的女人，她在年仅3岁的托尼亚身上看到了她成为一名花滑运动员的潜力，就这样，小小的女孩被送往了由戴安（朱丽安妮·尼科尔森 Julianne Nicholson 饰）执教的花滑队里，开始了训练。　　托尼亚的全部童年几乎都是在冰上度过的，直到有一天她在溜冰场遇见了名为杰夫（塞巴斯蒂安·斯坦 Sebastian Stan 饰）的男子，两人很快就坠入了爱河。杰夫改变了托尼亚的人生，却也成为了她的灾难，从此托尼亚要面对的，除了日益艰巨的训练外，还有来自杰夫的拳脚。在一场比赛中，托尼亚完成了冰上三圈半的跳跃动作，成为了美国第一个完成了这个动作的运动员，托尼亚因此名声大噪。

简介：12岁的小女孩乔治亚失去了母亲独自过日子，从未出现的父亲突然闯入她的生活。1994年出生的导演夏洛特·里根自编自导的长片处女作，她镜头下年幼丧母的小女孩不再是可怜兮兮的社会批判题材主角形象，而是个古灵精怪充满幻想的小“社牛”，一向以炫酷帅哥形象出现的哈里斯·迪金森（《悲情三角》）饰演父亲，两人将一出父女重逢后相互慰藉、走出悲恸的戏码演绎得轻松无厘头又不失温情。荣获2023年圣丹斯电影节世界电影剧情片单元评审团大奖、入围2023年北京国际电影节主竞赛单元。

简介：简•奥斯汀（安妮·海瑟薇 Anne Hathaway 饰）的一生是否如她的文字那样充满曲折的过程和完满的结局？《成为简》用传记方式描述她的一生：她的母亲竭力为她撮合婚事，对象是上层社会的有钱人。但是简不接受没有爱情的婚姻，认为女人要靠自己的能力去养活自身。于是，她拒绝贵族瓦斯莱先生的求婚，爱上了心灵相通的汤姆•勒弗罗伊（詹姆斯·麦卡沃伊 James McAvoy 饰）。　　好事多磨，有人从中作梗，导致汤姆家人并不赞成二人婚事，汤姆决定携简私奔。但是这样一来，汤姆的经济来源就会被切断，简亦将面临着世俗的压力和贫困的生活。到底二人在私奔路上会走得多远？会不会有美满的结局？

简介：Another of Mike Leigh's efforts in the Play for Today series. Home Sweet Home is the he tragic-comic tale of a lonely postman, the social workers who chivvy him about his estranged teenage daughter, and his secret affairs with the wives of his fellow postmen. "Though the social and economic situations of Leigh's characters are invariably specified, they are not determinative. In his view, institutions don't cause our problems and institutions cannot solve them. Nothing beyond the structure of our own thoughts and emotions can be blamed for our predicament and nothing outside of ourselves can remedy it. The poorest of Leigh's characters could win the lottery, or the richest be forced out onto the streets, without their basic dramatic problems changing. One only has to compare Ken Loach's Ladybird, Ladybird with Leigh's Home Sweet Home or his short, Probation, for the difference between the two viewpoints to be clear. Whereas Loach mounts an institutional critique, the social systems and bureaucracies in Leigh's work are only individuals writ large. Home Sweet Home dramatizes the relationship of two social workers, Dave and Melody, to a client, Stan, and his daughter Tina, but for Leigh the social workers are ultimately just messed-up people. One might say that while Loach looks at the effect, Leigh studies the cause. Loach studies bureaucracies; Leigh examines the individual qualities that make bureaucracies the way they are. The main characters in Ladybird, Ladybird are victims of a social agency's depersonalizing understandings. Leigh refuses to make Stan and Tina victims of anybody or anything. Home Sweet Home makes clear that, even if all of the social workers were to disappear from the universe, Stan and Tina's relationship would not improve one whit (and in fact would very likely get worse, since in the absence of a pushy, intrusive, boorish Melody, Tina would get no visits or trips home at all). There is an ultimate fairness in Leigh's view of life. We get what we are. Nothing is inflicted on us (just as nothing outside of ourselves can save us). We create our own problems and we ourselves must solve them. It would be hard to imagine a view of experience more at odds with the blame-games played by most cultural studies critics. Leigh's characters can never blame anything or anyone–least of all "the system." External forces (figured by ever fashionable ideological concepts like "power," "gender," and "class") have no ultimate authority over what we are. We are responsible for our own fates. The enemy, if there is an enemy, is inside. Odd as it may sound to say it, the writers on cultural studies and neo-Marxist filmmakers like Loach are actually more optimistic than Leigh, for while the social-work bureaucracy (Loach's target) may conceivably be reformed, the human heart and mind (Leigh's subjects) are all too deplorably (and exultantly) what they are for all eternity. I would argue that the institutional critique is in fact the simpler, more superficial, and more naive way of understanding these situations. The labyrinths of the human heart are far more tortuous and Byzantine than the corridors of power that constitute the welfare system. The bureaucracies of the imagination are far subtler and more insidious than those of any man-made institution. And if you say you don't see that or don't understand how that could possibly be, why that is precisely what a work like Home Sweet Home exists to show...." –Excerpted from Ray Carney, "The Films of Mike Leigh: Embracing the World "